Discussion about this post

User's avatar
da boom's avatar

I think the single- or two legged stool works for many, as long as you are willing to wobble. Outrage culture has a high moral standard and sustained emotions...

Expand full comment
Ben Wilterdink's avatar

You're making some really important points that seem to be (willfully) overlooked by a culture that insists on moral boundaries without a justifying (or any coherent really) metaphysics. You write, "But there is no way around it, if you want to say that sex trafficking is evil, and most of us do, you're committed to making strong metaphysical claims, like it or not."

Absolutely correct, but I'd also offer a slightly different formulation that I've found helpful in conversations from Justin Brierly's book. Basically, his observation/argument is that people do indeed have a strong sense of morality, of certain things actually being evil. Once this fact is acknowledged, the task then becomes thinking about what kind(s) of metaphysic would allow for it.

So, instead of the (true) assertion that *if* you want to be able to appeal to universal moral boundaries *then* you must accept a corresponding metaphysic, the question turns into an acknowledgement of sincerely held universal moral boundaries and asks what kind of metaphysic might best fit that fact.

Anyway, I've enjoyed these posts and will be curious to see where you take the conversation.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts