Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Miller's avatar

Richard Powers' books are fabulous! Some people believe in panpsychism which holds that all entities, even the smallest like quarks, have some degree of consciousness. There's a variation in process theology and open and relational theology called panexperientialism which holds that the smallest entities can experience but aren't necessarily conscious. That sounds weird at first, experience without consciousness of the experience, but we sometimes do that ourselves. Things happen to us, our body registers it, our brain registers it, but we are not conscious of it (unless we deliberately attend to it). For example, when I am out walking, listening to an audiobook, paying attention to the book while watching for cars (lots of the streets where I live have no sidewalk), and a breeze is blowing, I am totally unaware of the breeze most of the time. But my skin senses it, my neurons send the signals it causes to my brain, and my unconscious mind experiences it but I am not conscious of it. If panexperientialism is true, then it's easy to see that there might be a back-and-forth flow between nature and ourselves, we experiencing nature and nature experiencing us.

Expand full comment
Lars Coburn's avatar

This is what draws me into the Avatar movies. The connectedness - in the first film he is taught while hunting to say to the creature “I see you”. We have a family friend who was very much part of the New Age hippie spiritual but not religious movement in Eugene. She told us that she asks the rock in her garden permission before moving it. While we laughed and teased “and what did the rock say?” There is something to the practice of seeing, asking, and listening to nature that resonates differently. Thanks Richard for reminding me of this and pointing out a Psalm I’ve not paid attention to before.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts