It seems to me-for what it’s worth, that Barth’s idea that God is wholly other, totally outside of creation is a traditional Reformed understanding. Where he parts ways is that he’s expressing universalism, errancy of scripture sort of feels like existential theology to me. With everything Barth wrote, it’s not surprising that so many varying groups find some common ground.
It seems to me-for what it’s worth, that Barth’s idea that God is wholly other, totally outside of creation is a traditional Reformed understanding. Where he parts ways is that he’s expressing universalism, errancy of scripture sort of feels like existential theology to me. With everything Barth wrote, it’s not surprising that so many varying groups find some common ground.
I am grateful for the work you are doing in this series, Richard. Keep it coming.