Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ian Macdonald's avatar

Thanks for highlighting these aspects of atonement that get ignored/overlooked. Maybe you are going in this direction in future posts, but I think there's a way to connect the Primordial and Deuteronomic curses in a way that also relates to your previous series: ontology. Sinful behavior is a result of an ontological wound in human nature that was caused by Adam's sin (and is made worse with continued sin, in a negative feedback loop sort of way). This sin-disease in human nature makes it hard to live in the way that God wants for us (the way that leads to flourishing) and bends us towards living in ways that cause self-harm and self-destruction (on the individual and societal levels).

Ancient Israel (starting with Abraham, Sarah, and their descendants) were the group chosen by God to work toward the healing of human nature from the sin-disease. The laws and commandments were a kind of treatment plan for the sin-disease, and a natural consequence of the failure to participate in this treatment would be the destruction of their society (which is what the Deuteronomic curses symbolize).

Christ's healing of the wound in human nature, his dealing with the Primordial Curse, accomplishes the purpose of the Sinai Covenant, thereby fulfilling Ancient Israel's role on their behalf (who in turn were working toward healing the wound on behalf of all humanity). So the Primordial and Deuteronomic curses are dealt with simultaneously in Christ's life, death, and resurrection. And all humans have a path toward ontological healing through him.

Expand full comment
Glen Soderholm's avatar

Yes! And . . . I wonder if you could place the theology of recapitulation in the Adamic category as well? Irenaus's 'the unassumed is the unhealed'.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts