After having described money as a spiritual power in Money and Power, Jacques Ellul goes on to describe how our spiritual resistance to money involves "profanation," the desacralization of money.
To profane something involves reducing something sacred to something commonplace and ordinary. Generally, this is viewed as a bad thing. But if money is a spiritual power profanation, according to Ellul, is exactly what has to happen. Money has to be stripped of its spiritual potency. The spiritual power of money has to be removed.
Here is Ellul making this point:
The ultimate expression of [the] Christian attitude toward the power of money is what we will call profanation. To profane money, like all powers, is to take away its sacred character…it is just as possible to conduct such an assault against Satan and all he inspires. In this case, profanation is truly a duty of faith...
This profanation, then, means uprooting the sacred character, destroying the element of power. We must bring money back to its simple role as a material instrument. When money is no more than an object, when it has lost its seductiveness, its supreme value, it superhuman splendor, then we can use it like any other of our belongings, like any machine. Of course, even if this relieves our fears, we must always be vigilant and very attentive because the power is never totally eliminated.
We can call this profanation of money, this expelling its dark power, the "exorcism of money."
But how to conduct this exorcism? We'll turn to Ellul's answer in the next and final post.
Potlatch is the best idea we never had
First, I'm way behind/out of rhythm of reading your work. But THIS series is so timely for me. Maybe not entirely new conceptually, but a topic that has remained at the front of my mind these last 6-8 months. Essentially, that there is no "supreme value" to money. So of course we should give it away freely in charity. And of course we shouldn't worry about how much the anointing oils cost. If you are entirely unattached to it, if it holds no sacredness, if it possesses no transcendent qualities . . . then it is meaningless. It's just a material "thing."