Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Shell's avatar

“…Following from Thomas Aquinas, nature possesses an order and goodness that is not totally eclipsed by the fall. Creation is damaged and wounded, to be sure, but is not in a total state of ruin. Further, the goodness and order of creation is available to every human person. In this, we can say that creation is ‘graced….’ ”

One can draw a helpful distinction between “the creation,” all that God has made, and “the world,” all that rises and falls through the actions of human social behavior. It is this “world” that is constantly in flux between injury and healing. Both processes are perpetuated by human choices.

The ruin done to creation—today’s ever-increasing climate collapse, for example—is done by human beings who have forgotten or who even resist and deny the grace instilled in them at their own creation.

The healing comes when people make themselves vulnerable to God’s grace, first by looking honestly at their own fallenness, and then by opening to the leadings of the Spirit. Grace convicts us, and grace informs and guides us.

Expand full comment
Ethan Stuart's avatar

Good post. I reject all or nothing on either side of the debate. I personally find total depravity quite nauseating and harmful, and I think the notion we are all good is just naive. I think even the average layperson would acknowledge the evil humans are capable of, while rejecting that we are all bad, simply because it’s self-evidently not true. So I think we need to push back more against total depravity. I’m not even sure if it is theologically sound.

What do you think, Richard?

Expand full comment

No posts