Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan Sides's avatar

Love this. I’ve always been a strong proponent of the concept that God can, has, does change his mind. Does his nature change? His character? His faithfulness? No. But far be it from me to put God in any box.

I do wonder, however, if one might make a distinction between God mercifully relenting on the consequences of a sin vs. relationship mending forgiveness of that sin. Hebrews seems to teach that not only is there “no forgiveness without the shedding of blood” but also that Jesus’ sacrifice covers sins past, present, and future. So in that sense, David’s sin was already covered even before God decided to relent.

But again, that’s not a box I will put God in. I’ll leave that to the mysterious Hebrew author.

Expand full comment
Peter Mario Grach's avatar

From: Peter Grach

I'm OK with God changing His strategies, and even His mind as long as He doesn't change His mind about the salvation of people.

I agree with the article's recognition of God's mercy and grace in stopping the punishment for David's conducting a census of the people.

What is questionable for me is why 70,000 other citizens had to pay for David's action. We aren't told how the 70,000 were killed, but it must have caused a lot of sorrow and grief for a lot of families and relatives.

The only "compensating" scenario or potentially 'ameliorating hope' that I can try to hold onto concerning the justice, grace, mercy and lovingkindness of God in the circumstances of the present case, is that those 70,000 casualties (and their families, relatives, etc.) will be resurrected, restored, and led and enabled to receive salvation in some future age or time (as well as reunited with their loved ones).

God's love needs to triumph over any retributive justicial penal suffering, it seems to me.

Thanking you for reading my brief comments.

Yours faithfully,

Peter Grach

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts