Part 3, A Non-Contrastive Metaphysics of Transcendence and Immanence
Isn't this a good place to mention the Aquinas and the analogy (as opposed to univocity) of being? Or is his analogia entis still a contrastive metaphysics?
Isn't this a good place to mention the Aquinas and the analogy (as opposed to univocity) of being? Or is his analogia entis still a contrastive metaphysics?