2 Comments

Duns Scotus actually dove deeper into the participatory metaphysics of the early church fathers with his spin on nominalism. Before, "philosophers said God was a Being, which is what most people still think today. Both the Dominican Thomas Aquinas and the Franciscan Duns Scotus said God is being itself. The Dominicans said everything other than God participated in being only by analogy and by attempts to make connections, but it was not really the same being as God’s being. Yet Scotus believed we can speak “with one voice” (univocity) of the being of waters, plants, animals, humans, angels, and God. We all participate in the same being. God is one (Deuteronomy 6:4), and thus reality is one too (Ephesians 4:3-5)."

If you are looking for enchantment, "This gives us a foundation for understanding the sacredness of everything and our connection with everything. We are already connected to everything—inherently, objectively, metaphysically, ontologically, and theologically. We don’t create the connection by going to church or reading the Bible, although we hopefully enliven the connection... Our DNA is already divine; that is why we naturally seek to know and love God. There has to be a little bit of something inside you for you to be attracted to it; like knows like. You are what you are looking for!" (Parts in quotes taken from https://cac.org/daily-meditations/the-univocity-of-being-a-foundation-for-understanding-sacredness-2015-05-27/).

Expand full comment

I think. Therefore, I am . . . an antinominalist. I think.

Expand full comment