Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Saff's avatar

I think the _tension_ exists here, but the last paragraph seems to reduce it to a flat trade-off that doesn't seem to jive with all historical reality.

For example, during the Civil Rights Movement, did the US become more or less Christian? Did it become more or less democratic? My instincts are that King and others helped us become both more Christian and more democratic.

So maybe this isn't a flat trade-off, but a rare tension that is sometimes overcome, although rarely and with great challenge and cost?

Expand full comment
Dan Sides's avatar

I’m not sure about this particular tension. No doubt there is tension between liberal democracy and the type of faith promoted by Christian nationalists. But from my viewpoint, the faith of the gospels is just grateful to have the freedom and liberty to practice and live out the faith openly. It is not interested in any form of coerced or forced compliance, and really has little interest in politics in general, other than politics that continue to allow and foster a society of liberty to allow people to make free choices. Free choice is truly the only “Creator endowed” right we have as humans. All other rights are a matter of contract between the Government and the Governed.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts